Abdeslam’s Compression Collapse Theorem (ACCT): A Symbolic Resolution of Gödel, Paradox, and Logical Instability

24 June 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

This paper introduces a new symbolic perspective on Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem. We propose the Compression Collapse Theorem (ACCT), which states that any self-referential sentence embedding its own unprovability or truth condition exists in a compressed symbolic form that collapses when logically evaluated. We formalize the collapse of identity during evaluation and show that classical paradoxes—including Gödel’s sentence, the Liar paradox, Turing’s Halting Problem, and others—are not stable logical objects, but illusions of structural stability. ACCT provides a unifying symbolic boundary condition for evaluating recursive logic and proves that such systems lose their integrity upon self-access.

Keywords

ACCT
Gödel
paradox
incompleteness
symbolic logic
self-reference
halting problem
liar paradox
collapse
logical identity

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.